The Relationship Between Treatment Intensity & Treatment Outcomes for Children with Apraxia of Speech

by Aravind Namasivayam Ph.D. S-LP(C)

Childhood Apraxia of Speech (CAS) is in terms of diagnosis and treatment a very challenging and complicated speech disorder in children. Children with CAS find it difficult or impossible to accurately produce speech sounds and/or words despite having a good understanding of language. Although there are several treatment approaches for CAS, there are very few published studies examining their efficiency and effectiveness. For example, at present, we do not know the amount of change in speech intelligibility (the degree by which their speech can be understood by a listener) or their ability to communicate effectively in real world situations (i.e., functional communication) following treatment. We also do not know if more intense treatment (although promoted by most clinicians) is actually better for this population.  Thus, there is a strong need for well-designed research studies in this area to advance clinical practice.

In July 2011, the Childhood Apraxia of Speech Association of North America (CASANA) awarded a competitive clinical treatment research grant to Dr. Aravind Namasivayam of the Speech and Stuttering Institute in Toronto, Ontario, Canada. His team consisted of experts in the areas of CAS research (Dr. Ben Maassen, University of Groningen in the Netherlands), speech science (Dr. Pascal van Lieshout, University of Toronto in Canada) and speech disorders treatment (Ms. Margit Pukonen from the Speech and Stuttering Institute, Toronto, Canada). The CASANA funding was used in support of the research project titled “Exploring the Relationship Between Treatment Intensity and Treatment Outcomes for Children with Apraxia of Speech”. 

Using the funds from the CASANA grant a specialized screening tool was developed to identify a subpopulation of two to five-year-old children, who demonstrated characteristics of CAS, from a larger database of 102 preschool age children with motor speech issues. All children received a specialized motor speech treatment program delivered by qualified speech-language pathologists in one of two possible treatment formats: high-intensity (2 times a week for 10 weeks) or low-intensity (1 time a week for 10 weeks).  Each speech therapy session lasted for 45 minutes. The speech-language pathologists providing the treatment were randomly assigned to either of these treatment formats. A child’s ability to correctly produce speech sounds in words, speech intelligibility and functional communication were evaluated both before and after treatment. Speech intelligibility was assessed at the word-level (percentage of words correctly identified by a listener) and at the sentence-level (percentage of words correctly understood in imitated sentences by a listener).

Overall, the results of the study demonstrated that the outcomes of the high-intensity treatment were superior to those of the low-intensity treatment. Specifically, high-intensity treatment resulted in a significant change in a child’s speech production abilities, word-level intelligibility and functional communication when compared to low-intensity treatment.  Furthermore, high-intensity treatment produced almost twice the amount of positive changes and had fewer children failing in treatment (i.e. not showing any real progress- especially for speech production) relative to the low-intensity treatment.  However, neither high- nor low-intensity treatment improved sentence-level speech intelligibility in children with CAS.

This CASANA funded study represents the largest data set available to-date relating the amount of therapy induced change and treatment dose and its effects on speech intelligibility and functional communication outcomes in children with CAS. The results from the study could be used to set appropriate levels of clinician and parental expectations prior to treatment and could potentially guide clinical practice (e.g. amount and possibly type of treatment required for this population).

Importantly, even though positive changes were found for speech production and functional communication in CAS children with 20 sessions (2 times a week / 10 weeks) there was only minimal improvement in sentence-level speech intelligibility following treatment. Thus, the CAS children may benefit from more than 20 sessions of therapy and from a treatment program that systematically builds in practice of speech production targets in longer utterances (i.e. phrases, sentences, connected speech). At present additional analyses are being carried out to identify factors contributing to positive outcomes in children with CAS. For example, we ask which of the following factors affect a child’s treatment outcomes: child’s participation in the therapy process, amount of home practice and/or quality of parent-child interaction? With further analysis, we will be able to identify key factors that contribute to positive treatment outcomes in children with CAS and thus make a significant contribution to future clinical practice in this area.

[CASANA funded research dollars are raised through the Walk for Children with Apraxia]

Exploring New Treatment Methods for Childhood Apraxia of Speech

A study funded by CASANA was completed by Dr. Jonathan Preston, a researcher from Haskins Laboratories (www.haskins.yale.edu) and Southern Connecticut State University. The research involved using ultrasound (the same device used to obtain images of a fetus or heart) to provide a real-time visual display of the tongue. The ultrasound transducer is held under the chin, and the ultrasound images are then used to teach children how to move their tongue into different positions to produce certain speech movements. Speech-language pathologists can use this information to provide the child with cues about the tongue.

One advantage of using ultrasound biofeedback for children with persisting speech errors is that both the clinician and the child have more information about what the child is doing with the tongue when he or she speaks. Additionally, clinicians can provide more direct and explicit cues to the child, such as “move this part of your tongue up here,” and the child can readily see if the movement was produced properly.

Among the disadvantages of this approach are the cost of the equipment (the ultrasound probe costs about $5,500) and the need for clinicians to be trained in the approach.  Presently, only a few clinics in the country are using ultrasound biofeedback therapy. In general, children younger than 7-8 years are probably not good candidates for this type of therapy because it requires a great deal of focus and is not as “play-based” as some other therapy approaches.

The target group of children for this study was children who had speech errors that had not resolved by the age of 9 years.  Six children, ages 9-15, participated in the study for 18 therapy sessions. All children had been resistant to traditional treatment methods and were showing limited progress in their school-based speech therapy programs.  All of the participants in the study showed improvement in their speech sound accuracy on treated sounds, and all parents reported improved speech intelligibility.  Specifically, each child achieved 80% accuracy or higher on at least two treatment targets, and some children showed substantial generalization to sound patterns that were untreated.  Dr. Preston cautions that not all children necessarily respond equally well and that further research is needed. However, the use of ultrasound biofeedback therapy holds potential to become another tool in the toolbox for treatment of children with persistent speech errors.

 

Dr. Preston has recently applied for federal funding to continue to support this research.

 

[Note: CASANA research grants are made possible by funds generated by the Walk for Children with Apraxia]

Early Advocacy Made the Difference

By Sheri Larsen

As the mother of three young children, I figured I’d seen it all from ADHD, tonsillitis, surgeries, colds, and runny noses. I was wrong.

CJ was born on a crisp November day in 2003, two weeks earlier than expected, and with a true knot in his umbilical cord. He should not have survived.

Feeling tremendously blessed, we took CJ home and, for the next six months, went about the busy life of raising four children. The latter half of his first year was spent with picture books in his hands and puzzle pieces scattered on the floor. He was fanatical about pictures. So much so, that by twelve-months old he had mastered 60-piece puzzles with no aid at all, pointing out objects in the pictures. He figured out how to communicate his wants and needs. I used to joke, calling it our private language. He excelled in every area of growth, except for the normal sounds babies make.

His first birthday came and went, but did not take with it his inability to make sounds other than the grunts and groans we’d grown accustom to. With no improvement in articulating formidable sounds over the next months, I spoke to our pediatrician about my concerns. She set up an appointment for CJ, who was 22 months old at the time, to be evaluated by a speech therapist. Her trust in me as a parent would never be forgotten.

CJ was officially diagnosed with Apraxia of Speech.

Hearing CJ’s diagnosis being described as a neurological disorder could have crippled me. Instead, I collected research and questioned his two therapists on ways I could help him at home in addition to his therapy regiment. I searched magazines, the internet, and any other source to find pictures of everything under the sun. Shrinking the images and laminating them into a deck of cards made it easy to take to any ice rink or field my older kids were playing at. We would use car rides as therapy by flipping pictures to CJ and encouraging him to form the sounds. My older children helped, too. Slowly we saw improvement.

As a family, we dedicated ourselves to learning sign language and used amazing DVDs to do so. Once CJ was given his “Picture” book, he could hand us little images of his wants and needs. It was then that I finally understood what he had been telling me all along.

CJ had lots to say. He only needed help finding his voice.

My greatest joy was the first time I heard him say, “Mama.”

The next three years were spent in therapy, where CJ and his therapists developed a fond relationship, one that would unexpectedly follow him into elementary school. There, he entered special services for speech therapy. His original therapist took a job at the school and could keep an eye on CJ, one of her star little guys. We were so blessed.

But soon, it was evident that CJ had met and even surpassed the official state benchmarks to receive services any longer. It was then that an image of a chubby 22-month-old sitting at a lone table in his therapy room and swooning over the mini M&Ms, which had become his expected reward during speech, wafted across my mind. I knew how hard he had worked. I had educated myself enough about Apraxia to know that it could continue to affect him as his vocabulary and the demands on his system increased, especially around third and sixth grades. I could not let his hard work go to waste.

Through my advocacy, CJ was allowed to remain in speech therapy for the remainder of kindergarten, first grade, and the beginning of second grade. He is still in the second grade and was recently discharged from the program; however, I asked for a written agreement, stating that CJ will be allowed back into the program, with ease, if his speech skills backslide when entering third grade. Given that his original therapist is at the school, I am confident she, as his advocate, will insure CJ’s continued care.

The most important message I have through CJ’s story is parental advocacy. There is nothing wrong with standing up for your child’s well-being, as long as it is delivered in a positive manner. Parents can be their child’s voice, until he or she finds their own.

Every child deserves a voice.

More about Sheri Larsen



Sheri Larsen is a published freelance and short story writer, and KidLit author. Her current YA novel is with literary agents, and she’s preparing to sub one of her picture books to agents. Her website, Writers’ Ally (http://writersally.blogspot.com), is where she explores writing, children’s literature, and motherhood. She lives in Maine with her husband and four children.

Father Leads Team to Raise Awareness and Over $22,000 in 2011 Denver Apraxia Walk

(Top Photo from left to right: Jill (Gillian) Green, Saoirse Green, Dan Green, and Siobhan Green; Bottom Photo: Siobhan Green)

On November 15, 2011, Team Leader Dan Green of Westminster, Colorado was selected to win an iPad for his efforts of raising $20,861.31 for Team Siobhan, bringing his team total to $22,053.31 in the Denver Walk for Children with Apraxia of Speech. CASANA selected Green as the Team Leader of the Top Fundraising Team out of a total of 44 Walks held all over North America.

However, for Green, his family, and his team, the incentive was more than winning an iPad; it was about raising awareness in his community and while doing so, raising funds to better the future for his four-year-old daughter, Siobhan, and other children with Apraxia.

When Siobhan was around the age of two years, Green and his wife, Jill, noticed she was not speaking, prompting them to take immediate action like any other parent. From researching online, getting involved with a local county program, to hiring a private speech-language pathologist, they were determined to find answers and to get a proper diagnosis for her. It was not until nearly a year later that she was formally diagnosed with Childhood Apraxia of Speech (CAS).

“CASANA raised awareness so that Siobhan could be diagnosed, and early enough so that we could make an aggressive push to get her to articulate,” said Green, a consultant to startups and venture capital firms. “It was very helpful to go through all the research on the CASANA website and understand what we would be dealing with. The Walk in our area was also instrumental in getting us in touch with other parents of children with Apraxia in the area, allowing us to establish a local social network.”

This network included contacts to trained speech therapists and information that made Green a “smarter consumer of speech therapy services” which introduced him and his wife to techniques that would best help Siobhan resolve. After receiving this help, Green wanted to do more for Siobhan and for CASANA, so he decided the 2011 Denver Walk for Apraxia was his opportunity to do so. When he became aware of CASANA’s iPad prize to be awarded to the Team Leader of the Top Fundraising Team, Green decided to make this his goal; he wanted to win the iPad for Siobhan so that he could help her learn language and help reduce her frustration level.

So with a clear target in sight, Green developed a strategy that combined his passion for photography and knowledge of business he obtained from Harvard University. He gathered several photos of Siobhan he had posted on his Facebook and he drafted letters that could be customized later. Next, he compiled a list of contacts from social media websites including his Facebook and LinkedIn profiles, both of which have a combined 835 personal and professional connections. His determination to reach his goal allowed him to see every person in these networks as a Walk contributor and a supporter. He felt the more people he reached was one less person he had to give an explanation to about his daughter having Apraxia.

“Folks raising money on behalf of the kids shouldn’t feel shy about approaching anybody, as long as there’s a personal connection. You’ll be surprised who’s going to donate. Our donors included two bestselling business authors whom I know and have worked with,” said Green, who found a surprising number of people he reached out to also have kids with Apraxia. Furthermore, most were talking about their child having Apraxia for the very first time outside of their immediate families and donated because they were glad an organization was finally there to support kids with Apraxia.

Green managed his fundraising goal continually by changing the amount a few thousand dollars at a time, so that it would only take 10 or 20 donations of average size to reach it. Ultimately, he wanted donors to know they had a real impact in helping him reach his goal.

“None of the past donors object if you’ve been successful enough to raise the bar a bit more,” said Green. “They usually applaud the success. Somewhere in the back of my head I thought we’d raise around $10,000 but I didn’t want to put that into print because it’s too unattainable to the average donor,” said Green. “Then we blew through $10,000 and I started to think about $20,000, but even then I didn’t put it in print.”

Green’s strategy zeroed in on prospective donors who looked for clues about average donation size when asked to “give from the heart.” He explained that providing guidance to prospective donors and how the question was framed really made a difference in a donation size. For example, he would ask for a donation of $10, $25, $50; of $50, $100, or $250; or of $100, $250, or $500, depending on what the prospective donor’s capacity was and what their willingness to give would be. He also utilized additional page features, such as the ticker and thermometer widgets to help guide and nudge the donation levels up.

“We went to people we thought would be $500 to $1,000 donors first; they were the pacesetters,” Green said. “We made sure that group included senior family members and colleagues whose names on our ticker would be a beacon for other donors. Then we stepped down to folks who were earlier in their careers and had less capacity to give.”

He felt that anchoring at higher numbers from respected members of the community, which people could see on his personal donation page, enticed people who would not have given to give and those who would have given anyway, to give more. Finally at the end he asked people of some means to stretch a bit and to help him make his then-goal of $20,000; a goal that at one point he was at risk of missing.

“We thought we were tapped out at around $18,000, then saw some extraordinary generosity by people who love Siobhan and really wanted to help in her name,” said Green. “They’d been holding out because they wanted to be Team Siobhan’s second wind.”

In the middle of all of this, a crucial moment for Green helped him find more motivation to keep going beyond his goal. “Siobhan got flustered while trying to tell me about a doggie she saw,” he said. “She cried, held her tongue, and signed, ‘Daddy, help me talk.’”

Pushing all doubts aside, Green continued to support his daughter by raising a total of $20,868.31 in his enthusiastic campaign. With a couple of additional donations and company matches, his team’s total reached over $22,053.31 for the 2011 Denver Walk for Children with Apraxia of Speech.

“Following up with donors to ask for a company match is usually well-received, as it's often not much work on the donor's part and is a great way for the donor to magnify the impact of his or her donation,” said Green. His widespread reach included a total of 186 individual donors that as a result would help support CASANA and benefit important funding for future programs and research.

To find out more about the Walk for Children with Apraxia of Speech, visit: http://www.apraxiawalk.org/

Telling Anna's Story

By David Ozab (Writer and father of a daughter with Apraxia)

I didn't plan on becoming a writer, but I have a story to tell. The story of a little girl who knew what she wanted to say but couldn't make the words come out right. It's a story you probably know and share—why else would you be reading this blog?

It's the story of a girl in search of her voice. Her name is Anna, and she has Childhood Apraxia of Speech.

It took us a while to realize there was something wrong, but about the time she turned two we started to suspect it. I remember one day in particular. My wife Julia and I had taken Anna to our local Gymboree studio for open gym when a little voice caught our ears.

"Help please, mommy."

We turned to see a small boy struggling to climb up the ladder behind Anna. His mom leaned down and gave him a boost.

"Thank you," he said as he climbed the rest of the way up the play structure set in the center of the multi-colored classroom.

"He's a beautiful little boy," Julia said.

"Thank you," his mom replied.

"How old is he?"

"Eighteen months."

The words hit as hard as if the play structure had collapsed on top of us. Eighteen months old and his speech was clear and fluent. Anna was seven months older and we couldn't understand her.

That's when we knew there was something wrong, but we didn't know what it was yet.
Now Anna has always been a smart, creative, and outgoing child. She was already recognizing a handful of sight words and communicating with us as best as she could. We practiced by writing words on her Magna Doodle:

C-A-T

"Meeeow." She couldn't say "cat" yet but we knew what she meant.

D-O-G

"Rffff." A bark.

P-I-G

"Doh, doh, doh." Her approximation of an oink.

She was obviously smart and she knew what she wanted to say. She tried to communicate with us, but we only understood her about ten percent of the time. Mostly she babbled to herself or her toys. Every so often, though, she would ask for something and we'd have no idea what she wanted. I remember one evening in particular when she walked in our living room and announced:

"Awaem oobie ees."

"What's that honey?" Julia asked.

"Awaem oobie ees."

"I have no idea," I said.

She made the sign for eat, putting her hand up to her mouth.

"Awaem oobie ees."

"Eat," Julia said. "Eat what?"

"Oobie."

"Oobie?" I asked.

"No," Anna replied. Her "no" was unmistakable. "No oobie, oobie."

Anna folded her arms in frustration. It was hard not to laugh at the gesture, but at the same time I felt so bad for her.

"It's something she wants to eat." Julia said.

Anna smiled and nodded. "Oobie."

"So it's food, two syllables?"

"Great," I said. "We're playing charades with a two year old."

"You're not helping.

"Sorry."

Anna put her hands on her hips. "Oobie ees." The hands on the hips were even cuter than the folded arms, but we kept our laughs to ourselves.

"Oo - bie ees?" Julia sounded out the words, grasping at each syllable as it passed over her lips.

I joined her. "Oo - bie ees."

Over and over we both said it. "Oo . . . bie . . . ees." Then it hit me.

"Cookie please?"

Anna smiled and nodded again. "Oobie ees." She sounded so happy.

Julia got up and got Anna the cookie while I smiled back at Anna. I was her hero for the moment, but before long I'd be that stupid grown-up who couldn't understand her.

It frustrated Julia and I as much as it frustrated Anna. We knew she was smart, we knew she understood us, yet she just wasn't able to say what she wanted to say.

Now this may sound strange, but we were fortunate that Anna had been born with a cleft lip. We took her to Doernbecher Children's Hospital in Portland for her surgery at four months old and returned annually for visits with the various members of their Cleft Team. Up to this point, we hadn't seen their Speech Language Pathologist, but given our concerns we made an appointment.

The SLP saw Anna twice—in April and then October of 2008. The diagnosis? Childhood Apraxia of Speech. The recommended treatment? Speech therapy, twice a week.

She began therapy right after her third birthday. When she started, she was all but unintelligible, but within the first year she made tremendous strides. By the time she turned four we could understand about 75% of what she said and total strangers got about half. She's progressed even farther since then, and though we still don't understand her all the time she is mostly understandable, even to strangers. She started kindergarten in September and has transitioned into a public school environment with no difficulties.

And now we want to give back, so we are participating in our first Apraxia walk in Salem, Oregon, this Saturday. Marcie Phillips organized the walk in honor of her three-year-old daughter, Addison, who is the same age Anna was when she began her therapy. We hope that our participation will help her and so many other kids facing the same struggle Anna has faced every day for the last few years: The struggle to be understood.

Every child deserves a voice.


Biography: David Ozab is currently editing and revising his first non-fiction book, A Smile for Anna, which tells the story of his daughter’s cleft diagnosis and surgery, her difficulties with speech, and her incredible outgoing spirit through it all. He is a Contributing Editor at About This Particular Macintosh and a Guest Contributor at MyEugene. His writing has been (or will be) featured such diverse publications as Chicken Soup for the Soul, Errant Parent, and Catholic Digest. He is a stay-at-home dad and blogs about parenting and life at Fatherhood Etc (http://www.fatherhoodetc.com/). He lives in Oregon with his wife Julia, his daughter Anna, and two lop rabbits named Jellybean and Oreo.

Links:
David Ozab: Writer http://www.davidozab.com/ Salem, Oregon
Apraxia Walk: http://www.apraxia-kids.org/salemwalk/davidozab

Walking for Apraxia & Learning that THIS is OUR thing

By Kari Weed (SLP & mom of daughter with apraxia)

We had the walk last Sunday and it went unbelievably well! The day started out a little crazy. We woke up to downpours and threats of thunder and lightning. Bill and I decided we needed to change the park that we were originally planning on having the walk in, to a park with a shelter. We made some phone calls and then it went much better. The weather was okay, we had a huge turnout and as of date we have raised almost $10,000.00! My mom flew up for the walk, both of Bill's parents were there and his brother and sister. We had cousins, aunts and Lucy's Godmother and friends attend and were all decked out in our "I love Lucy" attire. It was wonderful! We felt so supported and I realized that there is a "village" that is cheering, supporting and loving Lucy! There were two experiences that day, that gave me goosebumps.


When I woke up that morning I was very proud of the money we had raised but felt that I wasn't sure if I would do it again next year. I don't like asking people for money, nowaday there are walks for everything and it took a lot of my time. But, then these experiences happened:

Experience #1

There was a 19 year old girl at the walk named Elizabeth. Elizabeth was at the walk with her mom and had joined a local team with out even knowing the kids. Elizabeth is 19, attending UW and has apraxia! She has been in therapy since she was 3, but did not get a diagnosis until she was in 2nd grade. Elizabeth's mom stated that she has been waiting for the northwest to finally recognize apraxia and they were so thankful to be there. I talked to Elizabeth and was intrigued by the way she talked. Her speech was in her throat, kind of like glottal sounds. It was different, but not too different. I found myself listening to her and praying that Lucy will talk that well someday! Her mom was so thankful and Elizabeth was very proud. She knew how hard she had worked and this group of people are the only ones who would understand that!

Experience #2

A dad walked up to me after the walk and asked if I was Kari Weed? I said "yes" and he said, "Thank you for organizing this walk, for the first time ever, I heard other children who speak like my son. Thank you." I had tears in my eyes by the time we were done talking.

Now we will be organizing this walk every year! After the walk was done and we cleaned up, some of our family came back to our house. We toasted with champagne, ate chicken wings and then crashed for a great nap! After nap time we again met with family and had a celebratory dinner. It was a wonderful day!

I have learned that yes there are walks for everything, but this is our thing. These parents and kids need a place to see that other families are dealing with the exact same issues. Our kids were celebrated that day. Our kids who get the dirty looks in restaurants when they scream a lot because they cannot talk; our kids who we all fear will never speak; our kids who we love so much and we would do anything to give them a voice. Yes, we will be planning this walk again next year because this is our thing.

Thank you everyone who supported us!

[Special Note: CASANA thanks the volunteer efforts of Kari Weed and all the Walk for Apraxia volunteers who dedicate their time to bring awareness to their communities, and so much more.  At the Walk for Apraxia you are among "your people", those who understand just what you are going through and share the struggle and the hope.  The Walk for Apraxia also raises important funding for programs and research.]

Triathlete Luke Farrell Takes on World and Speech Dyspraxia

Written by: Roy Elmer, Luke’s Grandfather

Please Note: Terminology used throughout this story, such as Speech Dyspraxia, is the same as Childhood Apraxia of Speech.

Triathlete, Luke Farrell, has had Speech Dyspraxia, SLI 5-6, since birth. Now 18, Luke is in his final year of school at Immanuel Lutheran College at Buderim on the Sunshine Coast. He also just received advice of another selection in the Australian team to compete at the World Junior Championships in Beijing, China in September 2011. He is widely regarded as an outstanding young man and a rising talent in the junior elite level Triathlon in Australia and internationally.

LUKE’S EARLY LIFE—A ROUGH RIDE.
At the age of four years, while living in Brisbane, Australia, Luke had not begun to speak and was diagnosed by a government department psychologist as having autism spectrum disorder. At this departmental officer’s direction, he was transferred from his local kindergarten to a “special” preschool, attended by children with serious disabilities. Luke was surrounded by youngsters with serious developmental and behavioral problems and had some disturbing experiences. These experiences created great angst for his parents regarding the short and long term effects. His parents made several approaches to the Education Department to sanction withdrawal or transfer, but nothing was achieved.

Once Luke reached primary school age, he was sent to a “special education unit” at the Mt. Gravatt East primary school in Brisbane. This brought new challenges for Luke, struggling to separate the teacher’s voice from other sounds in his surrounding environment and unable to comprehend the lessons. In attempt to cover this, he began to imitate other student’s reactions and behaviors, only to mask further the true nature of his problem. As time progressed, his family became aware that the only appropriate intervention he was receiving was one half hour every fortnight of speech therapy. His tuition time was shared with six other students and other lessons/services provided to Luke were of no benefit. His parents saw him being prepared solely for a life of limited expectations as a disabled person.

A GLIMMER OF LIGHT.
Luke’s first signs of an improved prognosis appeared only after he had the good fortune of being referred to Jane Remington-Gurney for speech therapy. Jane runs a company called “Options” Communication and Speech Therapy, operating at the cutting edge of the science of her profession. Upon the first meeting and subsequent consultation processes with Luke, Jane diagnosed Luke's condition as Verbal Dyspraxia, a disability presented as a speech language impairment, SLI 5-6, and a hearing and comprehension difficulty. Following Jane's diagnosis, Luke was referred to Dr. Ross, a specialist in Autism disorder and president of the Autism Association in Australia. At this consultation, Dr. Ross agreed with Jane’s diagnosis in which Autism was eliminated and Verbal Dyspraxia, SLI 5-6, was confirmed.

PATHWAY FORWARD.
Luke's parents were determined to give him, for the rest of his school life, the opportunity to keep in touch with his own peer group by finding and establishing his own level in his future. Their hopes were pinned on the private school sector, combined with continual monitoring and guidance from his speech therapist, Jane. The next step was to find a private school willing and able to accept the challenge of providing Luke a place in one of their classrooms as well as a meaningful education. Finding it proved to be very difficult as their search extended beyond Brisbane. It was not resolved until the principal at Immanuel Lutheran College, Buderim, called a meeting of the staff members who would be involved in delivering Luke’s education program. They accepted the challenge and for the first time Luke enrolled at Grade 3 to a normal classroom. The very next day the family relocated to the Sunshine Coast. This was an enormous dislocation for Luke’s parents who were faced with many challenges, including selling the family home and managing their Brisbane based business from 100 kilometers away.

Although it was understood that given the delayed start to education proper, Luke would have significant hurdles to overcome to graduate from high school. Guidelines were put in place to ensure minimum targets were achieved for Luke to have the ability to interact with other members of mainstream society, to have a positive self-image, and sufficient life skills to make his way in life. Happily, this target has been surpassed with already several bonus outcomes. Luke’s easy going nature attracted friendships essential to peer group acceptance. His shy but honest modesty following his successes with his sporting endeavors reflected credit on his school and firmed up his friendships, all of which are fertile ground for the formation of a healthy self-image and self-esteem.

SPORT—THE KEY TOWARDS NORMAL LIFE.
The role that Luke’s participation in sport has played in his progress towards a normal lifestyle is impossible to ignore. At the age of thirteen, after watching a televised triathlon event, Luke announced he was going to become a triathlete. Although he had never owned a bike or displayed any particular talent for running, he did not regard this as an obstacle. His parent’s only reaction was by providing encouragement, support and opportunity. That year, Luke entered the Mooloolaba Triathlon in the "come and try" series. This proved to be the most enjoyable experience in which he competed successfully. In the next four years, Luke’s progress displayed a rise through district, regional, and Queensland representative levels as he participated in state teams that won the Australian team’s championship, and then the honor of representing Australia in a triathlon. Luke appeared to make a quick and smooth transition from a “nobody” to “a big time somebody.” Nothing could be further from the truth.

In late 2008, Luke, who was only 15-years-old at the time, was producing impressive performances in the Gatorade age group events held in Queensland. As a result, he was contacted by the Triathlon Australia and with only one week’s notice to the first event, he was advised to compete in the South Australian, West Australian and ACT Triathlon State, under 19 age group, Sprint Championships. These races formed part of the selection trials for the Australian team to compete in the World Triathlon Sprint, under 19 age group, Championship. Luke finished first in Gleneg, South Australia; and second in both Rockingham, West Australia and Canberra. ACT. After returning home, Luke competed in the remaining events, winning the “Gatorade” series in his age group in Queensland, across six triathlons at different venues. These performances had been the reason for his gaining selection in the Australian team for his first time.

Following his results in special trials, he received advice from the Queensland Academy of Sport that he was an automatic selection in the Triathlon Queensland Junior Emerging Triathlon Squad (JETS). Shortly after, he also received advice from Triathlon Australia of his selection for their 2XU National Junior Development Camp. He was advised that his selection was based on his “Commitment, Attitude and Performance” and importantly, his “potential to become an elite athlete.” He would receive this invitation again in 2011.

In 2009, 16-year-old Luke was one of the youngest triathletes selected to represent Australia at his first ever World Junior, under 19 age group, Sprint Triathlon Championships on the Gold Coast. He finished in eleventh position in a field of 57, under 19 age group, competitors from around the world. After outstanding performances in 2010 state and national competitions and selection trials, he again achieved selection in the Australian Team for the 2010 World Junior Spring, under 19 age group, Triathlon Championships held in Budapest, Hungary. The domestic season finished in mid-March so Luke had only six months of training with no competition until the race itself in September. Despite these conditions, Luke finished in fourth place.

After resuming from his rest period after Budapest in late 2010, Luke competed and finished seventh place in his first elite Open Men’s triathlon event, the Queensland Triathlon Gatorade No. 1 race. From there he went on to achieve his third consecutive win, blitzing the field by a full two minutes, in the Queensland Triathlon “All Schools” 2010 championships. In 2011, he finished in second place at the Open Men’s event for the Gatorade No. 2 race at Robina on the Gold Coast, followed by a win in the Gatorade Bribie Island Junior, under 17 age group, Triathlon. Both proved to be just a warm-up for the Triathlon Australia, under 19 age group, championship held at Canberra in which he discovered his racing bike had a crack in its frame just before leaving. He still managed to finish second place at the 2011 Australian Championship event on a borrowed bike.

Over the next few months, Luke learned about the impact of illness on training and competition performance. He suffered a series of health challenges, including an ear infection, a virus and ultimately bronchial pneumonia, losing 5kg of body weight. Luke’s training load and competition schedule were reduced and he displayed great courage in persevering, especially with team events. Although the past few months have been a little quieter as a result of his ill-health, the exciting news is Luke’s selection again for the 2011 World Junior, under 19 age group, Triathlon Sprint Championship to be held in Beijing, China.

Luke’s support group is happy with his progress, despite the setback caused by his untimely illness. He is considered to be on track with his goal of life as a professional triathlete. After returning from a necessary rest period ordered by his coach, Luke entered the Hervey Bay “Olympic Distance” Triathlon to record a base time to qualify for future major events; Luke finished in fifth place in this Open Men’s competition. While there, Luke found himself competing against one of his idols, Courtney Atkinson. They talked after the event and instantly became friends. Today, their friendship continues by keeping in touch through Facebook. It is Luke’s sporting achievements that have opened doors to conversations like this, which were never dreamed of in those difficult early years.

TIME TO MAKE A DECISION ON A FUTURE LIFE.
After Luke finishes school in late October 2011, he will begin life as a semi-professional triathlete until he achieves his license as a professional. He will then be nearing the end of his third year of a four-year Operational and Strategic plan, put together by his family support group who were drawn together by Luke’s determination to succeed. He also aims to be a professional coach of these skills later in life, a remarkable ambition for a lad with Verbal Dyspraxia. Luke’s story reveals great strength of character, dedication and determination to succeed. His diagnosed medical condition is incurable, however Luke has used his sporting experience and successes to throw off its shackles and earn the admiration and respect of his peer group, both at school, in sport, and in the broader community. He has not cured himself of his condition, but has learned to “live with it.”

His appointment as captain of the Sunshine Coast Secondary schools regional team in 2011 indicates the respect he has earned from the regional team’s management. The team members and other competitors accept him into the peer group unconditionally and as a teenager living with Verbal Dyspraxia, Luke is immensely proud of his achievement in making his first public speech on accepting the trophy on behalf of his team.

In his short eighteen years to date, Luke Farrell has trodden over more obstacles, overcome more fears and moved further beyond his comfort zone than many people are asked to do in a lifetime. The simple act of mixing with his peers and fellow athletes who enjoy fluent communication skills has tapped his reserves of intestinal fortitude, and his peers’ lives have in turn been enriched as they have come to grips with communicating with Luke. Luke hopes his story, which basically comes down to accepting his situation, learning to cope with it as best he can, looking to his strengths, and getting on with life, will offer hope and support to individuals, parents or families facing similar challenges.

For more information go to Luke’s Website: http://www.lukefarrell.com.au/

E-mail: roy@lukefarrell.com.au

Truth or Misleading? “Children with Apraxia of Speech Make Very Slow Progress”

The Childhood Apraxia of Speech Association of North America (CASANA), along with members of its Professional Advisory Board, has engaged in discussion about the misleading impression that children with apraxia of speech make very slow progress in speech therapy. Some children are diagnosed with Childhood Apraxia of Speech (CAS) by speech-language pathologists who are using “slow progress” as the differential characteristic of the disorder. Is it true that children with CAS make very slow progress in therapy? Here is what we think:

• Children with apraxia of speech often make slower progress than children with other types of speech sound disorders. (Note: slower than other types of disorders; not slow in and of itself)
• Children suspected to have CAS but who make very rapid progress in speech therapy that generalizes easily to new contexts, both in and outside of the therapy room, most likely have a phonological disorder and NOT CAS..
• With appropriate goals, informed by detailed assessment – AND – appropriate, well executed speech therapy that incorporates principles of motor learning, children with apraxia of speech can be expected to make good, steady progress in therapy, especially those with age appropriate or near age appropriate cognitive and language skills.
• Both parents and SLPs should not blindly accept that, “progress will be or is slow because the child has apraxia.”

Discussion:

Speech progress may be very slow, even with appropriate planning and therapy, when other co-existing problems add to the challenges, including delayed cognition and/or receptive language, poor attention or behavior, and other significant speech diagnoses such as dysarthria. Additionally, children with CAS who are in poor health and not able to take full advantage of the learning and practice opportunities available to them, may demonstrate very slow progress in speech production skills.

With appropriate goals and intervention, parents of children with apraxia as the primary diagnosis should expect progress in their child’s use of intelligible words within a three-month period. (Children with apraxia plus other complex challenges likely will have more limited progress.)  If this progress does not occur for a child whose primary diagnosis is CAS, an SLP should consider the following questions:

• Is the diagnosis correct?
• Are the goals and stimuli appropriate?
• Are there additional diagnoses that should be considered, in addition to CAS?
• If there are other diagnoses, is one of them really the bigger challenge to the child’s speech production skills?
• Is the intensity of speech practice, both in therapy and at home, sufficient?
• Is the frequency of direct speech intervention sufficient?

Remember that although speech progress can be slower for children with apraxia than it is for children with other speech problems, there should be noticeable and ongoing progress in the child’s ability to independently produce intelligible words. While their words may not be “perfect”, one can observe increased movement toward intelligibility. Parents will want to be in contact with their SLP to discuss expectations and what modifications the SLP will make if progress is not being made.

Interview with Dr. Aravind Namasivayam

CASANA has awarded an Apraxia Treatment Research Grant to Dr. Aravind Namasivayam of the Speech and Stuttering Institute in Toronto, Ontario, Canada for his proposal, “Exploring the Relationship Between Treatment Intensity and Treatment Outcomes for Children with Apraxia of Speech.” Other co-investigators on this grant include Ben Maasen, Ph.D. of the University of Groningen, Netherlands; Pascal van Lieshout, Ph.D. of the University of Toronto; and Margit Pukonen, M.H.Sc. of the Speech and Stuttering Institute.  We interviewed Dr. Namasivayam about the grant project and that interview is below.

CASANA:  Why do you feel this study is important?

Dr. Namasivayam: There are a number of factors that may contribute to treatment outcomes in children with Apraxia of Speech (CAS) ranging from frequency, intensity and type of practice sessions to amount of home practice, parental involvement/participation parental skill and treatment fidelity, yet there is little empirical data regarding how these factors actually contribute to treatment effectiveness. The present large scale multi-centre study is the first of its kind to investigate:
 a) the magnitude of treatment effects,
(b) the relationship between treatment intensity and outcome measures and
(c) to identify the key factors that contribute to treatment effectiveness of motor speech treatment for this population.

For example, at the present time we do not know if the intensity of treatment (1x versus 2x a week) plays a role in determining the magnitude of treatment effects when controlled for treatment duration (10 weeks), or what are the effects of parental training and home practice on speech intelligibility and functional communication. Having this information will help us refine and guide clinical practice (e.g. service delivery models for this population).

CASANA:  In what ways do you anticipate the study being most successful?

Dr. Namasivayam:  We feel that the study will contribute significantly to the understanding of how the service delivery models (e.g. treatment intensity) affect treatment outcomes in CAS. This information could then be used to justify treatment schedule changes and funding allocation for treatment of this population. Also, findings of the study will yield important information relating to the impact of parental training and home practice on treatment success. This information can be discussed with parents to motivate and increase their participation in the therapy process. Finally, information on magnitude of treatment effects for outcome measures related to speech intelligibility and functional communication is limited for this population. Knowing magnitude of treatment effects is important for two reasons: (a) it can be used to set appropriate levels of clinician and parental expectations prior to treatment, and (b) it allows for planning of future studies in terms of study design and sample size.

CASANA:  What are the biggest challenges you will face with this study?

Dr. Namasivayam:  The biggest challenge as with any large scale multi-centre study is to limit inter-clinician and inter-clinic variability and make treatment replicable. We have taken a number of steps to ensure both quality and quantity of treatment is delivered as intended. For example, all clinicians prior to participating in the study were given a structured 30 page manual, had to attend 2 rigorous multi-day workshops on assessment and treatment of children with motor speech disorders, had to complete 2 online video based assignments, and pilot the treatment protocol as a case study in their own clinics. These procedures were developed to allow us to maintain a high degree of treatment fidelity across clinicians and clinics. Additional challenges include getting ethics approvals from a large number of centers and hospitals within a short period of time, and finding sufficient assistance and financial resources to meet project timelines.

CASANA:  When this study is successfully completed, what future research do you expect?

Dr. Namasivayam:  We hope to continue several lines of research based on the factors that may contribute to treatment outcomes in children. For example, we would like to investigate how a clinician’s skill level and training may affect treatment outcomes or how a clinician’s accuracy, timing, and type of cueing in treatment alters treatment outcomes for CAS. These are critical follow-up questions to this project.

CASANA:  What are your thoughts on CASANA's Apraxia Treatment Grant Program?

Dr. Namasivayam:  Through it's research program, CASANA is fostering exciting research that will help us develop a deeper understanding of CAS and how to treat the disorder more effectively. Our research team would like to extend our sincere thanks to CASANA for providing us with the opportunity to contribute to this cause.

It is expected that about 200 children with motor speech issues will be participating in this study, with a significant portion of them displaying signs and symptoms of CAS as defined in the 2007 ASHA technical report. Without the financial help of CASANA we would not be able to identify, analyze, and report on data relating to treatment effects in this subpopulation of CAS within the larger motor speech research study.

We hope that the study will provide concrete information on the impact of service delivery models (e.g. treatment intensity), parental training and home practice and magnitude of treatment success. Based on the findings of our study, we would be better able to justify changes to service delivery models and funding allocation for treatment, and to motivate and increase parental participation in the therapy process, allowing clinicians to develop appropriate levels of parental expectations and finally, to permit future researchers to plan appropriate study designs and estimate sample sizes. In this manner we feel that the proposed study directly relates to the mission statement of CASANA: “To strengthen the support systems in the lives of children with apraxia, so that each child has their best opportunity to develop speech”.

What Causes Childhood Apraxia of Speech and Is It Preventable?

From CASANA

First, it is important for parents to understand that there is most likely nothing that you did to “cause” your child’s speech disability. It is not about how much you talked to your child or whether or not you had them in daycare, for example. Your child does not have apraxia because you separated from your spouse or because you moved to a new city. So while we know that parents have a strong role in healthy child development, unless there was abuse, neglect, or isolation, you are not responsible for causing your child’s speech disorder.

The current knowledge that we have about Childhood Apraxia of Speech (CAS) is this. CAS occurs in the following 3 conditions:

• Neurological impairment caused by infection, illness, or injury, before or after birth or a random abnormality or glitch in fetal development. This category includes children with positive findings on MRI’s of the brain.
• Complex Neurodevelopmental Disorders – We know that CAS can occur as a secondary characteristic of other conditions such as genetic, metabolic, and/or mitochondrial disorders. In this category would be Childhood Apraxia of Speech that occurs with Autism, Fragile X, Galactosemia, some forms of Epilepsy, and Chromosome translocations involving duplications and deletions.
• Idiopathic Speech Disorder (a disorder of “unknown” origin) – with this condition, we currently don’t know “why” the child may have CAS. Children do not have observable neurological abnormalities or easily observed neurodevelopmental conditions.

Parents often ask if their child may have apraxia due to medical complications during pregnancy or childbirth. There are currently no studies that suggest a direct relationship between complications of pregnancy or childbirth and a specific increase in risk for apraxia of speech. For example, an umbilical cord wrapped around the neck of a fetus could theoretically cut off oxygen supply and possibly lead to neurological injury, eventually resulting in a CAS diagnosis. However, such a condition could also NOT result in CAS or even neurological injury. Some children are born just fine even though there was some complication during pregnancy or birth. So, while it is possible that a complication could result in neurological damage that might contribute toward a motor speech disorder like CAS, research has not told us when or how this would occur.

Some speculate that some forms of CAS and other childhood conditions may be a result, in part, of environmental conditions such as exposure to pollutants and toxins before or after birth. Others speculate that nutritional deficits or malabsorbtions cause CAS. We do know that, generally, toxins and nutritional deficits do cause some developmental problems, but to date these theories, as they relate specifically to CAS, are only speculations.

That said, a child’s positive health would contribute to their ability to benefit from their learning exposures and from therapy designed to help them. A child who is healthy is more fully capable of taking advantage of opportunities to learn. Children who are sick frequently with ear and sinus infections, enlarged tonsils and adenoids, asthma, allergies or have sleep disturbances, poor diets, attention and behavioral difficulties are going to find it much more difficult to benefit from the help provided. Helping your child be healthy and thus more “present” to the learning opportunities around them is one way parents can help.

Most likely in the future we will learn that CAS is caused by multiple factors and conditions, not one. To the extent that research evidence becomes available that CAS is caused by some factor(s) that can be manipulated to reduce or eliminate it, will determine whether or not it is preventable. Until then, we do know that appropriate speech therapy provided frequently and in consideration of motor-speech treatment principles offers the single most important opportunity for children with CAS to improve their speech capacity. Children who are able to maintain optimum health will most likely directly benefit the most from appropriate help.

Is Your Nonverbal Child Safe on the School Bus?

by Sharon Gretz, M.Ed.

[April 14, 2013:  Unfortunately, it keeps occurring.  Today we learn of 3 year old Elliott from Minnesota, who has childhood apraxia of speech, and never made it to school.  His mom thought he was playing and learning but he never made it and when he did not arrive at home on the bus and she called the school, the school said he had not been there. He was found 4 hours later still strapped in the bus in the bus terminal.  We are so grateful that Elliott is safe. Please read the article below and consider what you can do for your child or in your school district to make sure this doesn't happen!]

Two weeks ago we learned of a very disturbing story via the internet about a four year old girl with childhood apraxia of speech who was left unattended and forgotten on her school bus for over three hours. Little blond Ava was unable to yell out for help. Despite school district bus safety policies and procedures, the bus driver allegedly failed to do the seat by seat check that would have located Ava in the rear of the bus. An investigation ensued and shortly thereafter the bus driver resigned.

Ava’s family would like the Apraxia-KIDS community to understand how important it is to ask questions about your school’s bus safety procedures and to ask for a written copy. No one thinks that this can happen to their child, however, on the CASANA facebook page a number of parents are reporting similar stories about their child being placed in unsafe situations. For example, one boy was driven past his bus stop but could not tell the bus driver and was taken back to the school before he was noticed. Another child was crying on his bus but since the school bus driver did not understand his communication, no one knew why or what had happened. And tragically, a similar story occurred a decade ago to another little boy who was left on the bus in the bus garage for hours. On a brighter note, parents on our Facebook page also discussed safety procedures that are in place for their child who is nonverbal or limited verbal.

So the bottom line is this: What can parents to do best protect their child with limited intelligible speech?

1. Make sure that your school district has bus safety procedures in writing and assure that you get a copy of the policy.
2. Inquire about whether your child’s bus driver has had special needs training. Arrange a meeting between school administration and your child’s bus driver to discuss your son or daughter’s communication needs.
3. Include travel safety and transportation details as part of your child’s I.E.P. Transportation is considered a “related service” and so specific transportation details can and should be included when the IEP team has agreed to include transportation for your child. A transportation plan would be a tremendous addition to the IEPs of children who are unintelligible or nonverbal.
4. Communication goals at school and at home should include self protection and self identification goals. Children with communication challenges need a way or need practice with skills such as calling for help (“Help Me”); how to gain someone’s attention (“Hey you!” “Wait!”). These phrases can be incorporated into speech targets or augmentative communication.

Having a child left alone for hours on a bus is easily every parent’s nightmare but is particularly disturbing if the parent is already concerned about a child’s ability to speak out. Careful planning and team work are essential to assure the protection of all, but most of all for the child. 

If you are a parent, do not let your concerns and worries be pushed aside. If you are an educator, be an advocate to make sure that children with no or little speech are kept safe!  For a guide designed for both parents and educators, please read An Overview of Special Education Transportation:A Primer for Parents and Educators.

Small Seeds Watered with Tears

[Written and delivered at the 2009 Pittsburgh Walk for Children with Apraxia of Speech]

by Sue Freiburger

When I look at Sean, it is hard to believe how far we have come in the past six years. He has grown in so many ways and achieved so much more than we had ever hoped for.

I want to share our story with the parents here with young children with apraxia. Sean’s apraxia was so severe that after a year of speech therapy thru early intervention, the only sound we had was “eh”. We discovered CASANA when Sean was around two and a half years old and began really aggressively pursuing intensive specialized therapy. We came to Pittsburgh to have Dave Hammer evaluate Sean and confirm the diagnosis of apraxia. My expectation was that we would leave with a treatment plan and a new direction. I was very hopeful that this would be our turning point.

After a two day evaluation, Dave sat down with us to review his results. The results were not good. Dave said that he was unable to stimulate any speech production from Sean and that at best, he could confirm a suspected severe case of childhood apraxia of speech, with a suspected underlying genetic condition. His prognosis of Sean every becoming a verbal communicator was poor. I held back my tears as I felt my world collapse beneath me. If an expert like Dave didn’t think that Sean was likely to ever be able to talk, where would we go from here?

As we got into out car, the tears started to flow. I knew that I had to pull myself together before we got back to the hotel room where my mom waited with our other two children. Eric had spotted a garden center across from the speech therapy center and thought that could be a diversion for both me and my mother. He suggested I pick out a special plant for her to thank her for coming to Pittsburgh and helping us out during Sean’s evaluation. I was drawn to a small lily plant that was very fragrant. I could explain my red eyes away by saying the flowers had aggravated my allergies...

My mother took the plant home to NY and planted it in a special spot in her front garden. We took Sean back to VA and began our search for a speech therapist who could offer us the intensive specialized therapy that Sean needed. We also began to investigate augmentive communication devices.

It was a long year, with many visits to specialists, long battles with the school system, and about nine hours of private therapies a week, but the following summer, Sean was successfully communicating using his Dynavox Augmentive Communicative Device. That June got a call from my mother telling me that the “Mr. Hammer” lily was in full bloom and it was spectacular.

Due my husband’s job transfer, we ended up moving to Pittsburgh that summer. Unfortunately, there was a long waiting list to get into speech therapy with Dave Hammer, but we kept plugging away. Sean slowly began to find his voice, starting with "Polamalu" when he was around four and half years old and is now quite the talker (and still a huge Steelers fan!)! After almost a year, Sean was able to start therapy with Dave Hammer and Dave couldn’t believe that this was the same little boy he had evaluated almost two years ago. We worked together as a team with Mr. Hammer and Sean continued to thrive. The “Mr. Hammer” lily is around eight feet tall and continues to remind us how far we have come from the day when we felt that all hope was gone.

Over the years, I have spent many hours in my garden, using it as my therapy to work out my frustrations with the long slow process of helping Sean to find his voice. Many of my plants have been watered with tears, but each year, they come back stronger and bigger than ever. Dave Hammer sometimes wonders if he should have given us such a grim prognosis at the evaluation, but we both know that it was a fair evaluation. Without his honest assessment, we never would have know just how hard we would have to work to help Sean find his voice. We would have accepted the school systems assessment that a three year old couldn’t use a high-tech augmentative communication device. We would have waited and waited for the words to come. The path we had to take was a difficult one, the work was hard, but Dave has given us a gift that we can never repay. Sean now has a voice and I have an enormous garden! We dug up a piece of that “Mr. Hammer” lily and split it – a piece of it to grow in my garden and a piece for Mr. Hammer to plant in his yard.

I collected seeds from the flowers in my garden to share with the other parents today. Scatter these in your garden to remind you that from small seeds, beautiful and wonderful things can grow. Let your tears flow on the days when things are tough, but hold on to hope.

Mississippi River Apraxia Challenge (MAC Ride) and Tom Welge Solidify Choice of Speech Language Pathology Careers

by Ellen Groh & Lindsay Croegart

In the beginning hours of daylight on Sunday morning, September 20, 2009, a brave and driven group of men hopped on their bicycles to begin a 585-mile bike ride to raise funds and awareness for childhood apraxia of speech. Being the parent of a child with apraxia, Mr. Tom Welge made a commitment to bring support to a cause very close to his heart.

The students and faculty in the Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders at Augustana College in Rock Island, Illinois wanted to welcome Mr. Welge and his crew to our campus for fun, food, and a little time away from their already-muddy bicycles. Mr. Welge’s cause is also one of our own causes and we had a desire to show our support. Students welcomed the Mississippi River Apraxia Challenge (MAC) Riders and presented them with not one—but two—checks. With the help of many students, $600 was raised to donate to CASANA in honor of Mr. Welge and his crew’s expedition. Augustana students were not the only ones to donate; the Benisch’s (whose young son attend the Augustana Center for Speech, Language, and Hearing) also raised $510 for CASANA.

After receiving our donations, Mr. Welge asked if he could speak to us and began to warm each of our hearts by providing thanks and appreciation to professors, advice and support for parents, and a certain validation for each student standing in the crowd. Mr. Welge thanked the 100+ Augustana CSD majors not only for the picnic and donation, but also for choosing a self-less vocation. His gratitude (for our participation in the MAC Ride ‘09 event and our career choice of CSD) was expressed as he thanked the students, mentioning his own family’s positive experience with speech-language pathologists. As he began to well with tears, so did many of us. Mr. Welge generously expressed his excitement of having the Augie students standing there on the picnic lawn as representatives of the upcoming generation of professionals in the field of CSD.

Making decisions that affect the rest of your life is daunting; choosing a major and future profession is no different. When I (Lindsay Croegaert) began my first CSD class at Augustana College, I realized my interest in the field. Despite my passion for CSD, worry began seeping into my mind: What if there is a better profession out there for me? How will I ever know whether I chose the right career path? Although I felt anxiety over choosing CSD as my one and only major, I was still excited to finally start my classes in the department. I jumped at the first service-learning project opportunity—MAC Ride ’09. During Mr. Welge’s emotional speech expressing his thanks and gratitude to the students, my doubts disappeared. I was no longer worried about my intended major—I no longer had any reservations. In addition to completely removing doubt about my choice as a major here at Augustana, Mr. Welge also reminded me that the education I’m currently receiving isn’t just about earning a degree. My preparation and education here at Augustana are stepping stones that will help me help others. The career and the life that I’ve chosen for myself benefits so many more people than just me. I can’t thank Mr. Welge enough for his thoughts and words. He and his team inspired and validated each of us through their motivational message more than they’ll ever know.

I (Ellen Groh) am a senior this year at Augustana. Amid the stress of finishing my undergraduate degree and applying for graduate school, I rarely am able to imagine my life outside the world of education. Yet listening to Mr. Welge speak, I became able to envision the life I will lead when my last three years of school have been completed. Mr. Welge helped remind me how powerful my job will be as a speech-language pathologist. I will care, teach, love, and help individuals every single day in my profession. After meeting the MAC Riders, I again could see the bigger picture. We really will make a difference—students, SLPs, families, professors, and professionals working together as one. The MAC Ride event helped to instill the idea that we are one big team, reaching for an even bigger goal. As CASANA’s motto states, “Every child deserves a voice.” I am touched and truly blessed to be part of a team that makes the voices of children heard.

Ellen Groh and Lindsay Croegart

Augustana College, Rock Island, IL

Communication Sciences and Disorders Classes of 2010 & 2012

Emilee's Journey - Never Give Up Hope

[A letter from Emilee's parents and one that brought tears to our eyes!]

Through the years we have enjoyed reading the success stories of fellow CASANA families. At the risk of bragging (Why not? We’re proud parents. That’s our job!), we would like to share our own story about our daughter, Emilee…

In 1998 at age 3, Emilee was first diagnosed with Apraxia. In the fall of 2005 at age 11, we watched with great anxiety as Emilee descended into the jungle of the middle school. Her learning differences, the academics, social issues, and even being able to open her locker, were all things that kept us up at night wondering how she was ever going to survive the fall of 6th grade, let alone the whole middle school experience.

Well, through more hard work than we could have ever imagined, along with the help of some truly wonderful teachers, aids, her family, and a great (small) group of friends, not only did she survive, she THRIVED. At her 8th grade “graduation” last month, we learned that Emilee was one of only 15 students in a class of 168 to earn the President's Award for Educational Excellence for maintaining at least an “A-“ average in every subject for the entire 3 years of middle school. In addition, she was one of 4 girls nominated by her peers and teachers an award, which is given each year to the outstanding boy and girl in the 8th grade. While she was certainly not one of the more “popular” students, her peers and teachers really admired her incredible work ethic and kindness to others. Needless to say, we could not be more proud of her.

For ninth grade, Emilee will be headed to a small private school just outside of Boston. While they do not offer “services” per se, they specialize in a “multiple intelligences” approach to teaching with small class sizes and a learning center to help guide the students along. It looks like it is going to be a great fit and Emilee is very excited.

Our message to those just starting down the path with a child with CAS would be to never give up hope. While this difficult journey to “Holland” (http://www.our-kids.org/Archives/Holland.html) is far from over, there are wonderful stops to enjoy along the way. You just have to watch for them, because you never know when or where they will pop up. Emilee never ceases to amaze us: from speaking when it was unclear how well she would ever speak, to riding a bike when it looked like a lost cause, to thriving in middle school, when we were worried if she would ever survive it. We are looking forward to seeing what the next four years of the journey will bring.